Hostile Mint Case Study

Case 1 Hostile hoi polloi its probably the last take aim you might expect to find a impertinent work environwork forcet. First of all, its a federal workplace. And even to a greater extent surprising, its heavily guarded against intrusion. only the situation inside the U. S. messiness in capital of Colorado was anything solely a safety place for 71 women who brought a billing to the facilitys equal affair opportunity (EEO) policeman in 2003. When the organizers of the billing began to fear that they were the investigation targets instead of the complaints, 32 of the women decided to take the matter to the U. S. pit Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Their competitor The Denver kettle of fish was a inimical work environment. These allegations were the culmination of a government issue of incidents that had occurred over a long period of time of time. The Denver cud, which opened in 1863, has 414 employees, of which 93 are women. One woman who started functional at the Denver Mint in 1997 said, She anchor the atmosphere completely hostile toward fe priapics. When she filed an EEO charge claiming discrimination, she was retaliated against by having most of her gambol duties reassigned and being required to work at home.Events leading to the current complaint started in 2001, when another pi notwithstandingate employee who was inspecting a mens room for cleanliness saw a loose ceiling tile, removed it, and effect 40 to 50 sex magazines. few months later, this same employee was checking for rats in an attic and entrap a stash of pornographic magazines. some(prenominal) times she made these discoveries, she was with a manly colleague. Later, she would say in a controversy given to the main office of the U. S. Mint that to her knowledge no action was every taken to address the situations.Another female employee filed a claim of retaliation and intimate harassment with the facilitys EEO officer in 2000. It was 2003 before she got a au dition with the EEOC and an administrative judge ruled in favor of the Mint. However, when she filed her claims in federal woo in 2005, a jury found that she worked in an environment hostile to women and awarded her $80,000. In 2001, the facilitys new superintendent held a womens forum attended by the then-director of the U. S. Mint. However, the highest-ranking woman at the Denver Mintthe administrative services chief, Beverly MandigoMilnesaid, zipper changed. The final straw that triggered the complaint was the demotion of the push-down stores acting EEO manager in February 2003. The month after the demotion, the 71 women filed the supplicant alleging a hostile work environment. An separate from the San Francisco Mint was assigned to investigate however, the women claimed that the investigation never focused on the facts, but on Milne. One of the women said, They believed that Beverly coerced everyone into filing the petition. That was when 32 of the women took the matter to the EEOC.Despite the filed petition, hostile situations still continued. One woman said that in 2004, a male co-worker offered to represent her for sex. Another woman said that after she returned after a short disaster leave following her husbands death in 2005, a male supervisor propositioned her. On March 31, 2006, the U. S. Mint and the female employees who had filed the class complaint reached a proposed settlement. The terms of the settlement included a payment of $8. 9 million for damages, fees, and costs. The go press release of the United States Mint and Class Couns